Often I hear someone mention how they want to be able to release a penny. Their teams complete features and they want to get it to customers immediately to get feedback! Unfortunately, in some organizations, they have to wait until the release scheduled to complete their work. For some agile organization, it means every two weeks.
Also Read: software testing companies
This is certainly better than quarterly release days (it hurts to type and regret it if it's still you) but not where they will like it. That dream for most organizations to be able to successfully master what I describe in my opening sentence: Sustainable integration, continuous delivery (CI / CD). CI / CD may not be the concept that I introduce for you for the first time. There are enough thousands of articles, books and blogs on CI / CD. That's just that, why is CI and CD get all the fame? What about his unknown brother, continuous testing (CT)? I want to spend this blog talking about sustainable testing and how you, as testers, can help define and implement CT as part of your DevOps strategy in your organization.
Also Read: QA
testing services
Before we start circling and throwing CIS, CD, and CTS (Oh My!) Let's start with the general definition for the three. Sustainable integration described only as developers make small code changes and often check them into a shared repository. Continuous shipping is an extension of CI. When the code is checked, test the automatic process and push the code into the specified environment. Continuous testing is a process that allows to execute your automatic test in your entire CI / CD pipe to ensure the code must be pushed through. Your days against "Small Change Lines, No Testing" The fight is over!
Also Read: software testing company
What is actually seen for continuous testing for the tester?
In the world of sustainable testing, a developer will make code changes and push it to your source repo where the unit test will automatically run. However, instead of someone who manually uses the code to the testing environment (without knowledge about the state of the building), a series of other automatic tests will run; If they graduate, it spread! If not, beware of the masses! The process of spreading code-build-test can be done every night with automation in place. When you come to the office (or, because quarantine, drag it to your home office desk) every day you know there is a new building that is deployed waiting for you who have gone through a predetermined level of validation. Call me bias but, CT is a glue that unites everything.
Also Read: automation testing company
I want to stop and talk to my manual tester for a moment. If you read this and think, it mentions a lot of automation, where do I match? Let me assure you. In this world, manual testers are even more important: automation cannot (and may not) imitate the smart tricks you use to find bugs. They cannot test ad-hoc or exploration. Automation is intended for a set of worldly scripts, calculated that runs on the command. Moving forward, where various automatic script sets provide forward to progress, even more importantly that manual testers are involved and trusted to test new features that come and help maintain a solid regression suite.
Also Read: software testing services company
Continuous testing allows you, testers, to get feedback to your developers as soon as possible. Traditionally, testing is complete as the final step, before deployment. Multiplying the code continuously throughout the life cycle allows the team to get feedback quickly and find previous bugs in the development cycle.
Also Read : software testing outsourcing companies
How can a quality engineer impact on a sustainable testing strategy?
No matter the title you have, we can all be leaders - just see you here, read blogs and study goods. Leaders help mold and encourage the strategy and as a QA leader is our duty to harmonize the QA strategy with the overall business objectives. Warning spoilers, getting new features to customers as fast as possible is the goal, and it should be so.
No comments:
Post a Comment