Tuesday, 1 September 2020

4 reasons why the original application that is perfect for testing the strategy bur stable

 


Last month, Apple reported that it has facilitated nearly half a trillion dollars (the 'T') of economic activity through the App Store. This is a very large figure, but also credible. Smartphone, once a business tool steel is now used by every segment of society, and businesses have launched their own application as a response.

 

Apps offer unique advantages for businesses. First, there is an element of engagement. Simply put: people use their phones a lot. Research from RescueTime from mid-2019 put the number at about three hours and fifteen minutes a day - or nearly 50 days every year.

 

And then there is the fact that smartphones present new opportunities for engagement. Analysis of push notifications for mobile application makes it easy to reach and understand your customers.

 

Of course, it's never that simple. application development is a complicated business, and the approach taken by a software development company ultimately determine what applications can do, the value it delivers, and testing techniques to adopt a bottom-line.

 

A tale of two application development approach

Perhaps the first decisions made while developing an application is whether to take the original approach or using web-based technologies. Many developers take the latter approach, simply because it is easier. Web-based applications written using three cornerstone technologies browser: HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Because it is built using the universal language, they can be used in relatively Android and iOS app stores without special modifications primary platform. There are downsides, however. Web-based applications are usually slower and less capable than their original rivals. They also often rely on online services to work, which means that if the user is offline, your application will not work.

 

In contrast, the native application built specifically for the platform on which they would run. Developers who work with Apple's iOS will often use Swift and Objective-C language, while in the world of Android will use three languages ​​supported by Android Studio: Java, Kotlin, and C ++. This is not an exhaustive list. There are many third-party solutions that enable developers to build native applications with other languages, including Python (via PyMob), C # (with Xamarin) and Ruby (with RubyMotion).

The original application development is more involved affair, so inevitably in the development cycle more, and more work-hours required. You also need to make a separate application for each mobile operating system you want to target. As a result, the higher upfront costs. But there are significant advantages that make it an attractive option for businesses.

 

Because they are being developed and built specifically for the mobile platform, they're faster. They are also easier to match the aesthetics of the mobile platform. With long-term value as an application based on user retention for the acquisition, this is very important. You want your users to be happy.

 

At the technical level, the original application typically have greater access to the API of the underlying mobile operating system, so it is easier to access hardware devices: a camera, accelerometer, and so on.

 

Enter burstable testing

burstable testing is an iterative approach to software QA. In essence, it builds upon existing human test-driven approach to network and see the tests carried out in short "bursts" to identify weaknesses.

 

Testing of a larger team, pre-trained, and normally distributed. There is a reason for that: improve the availability, allows testing to be performed in a short time. Communication emphasized. Similarly, specific domain knowledge. It was a complex understanding of an application helps the overall testing process. And for native application testing, burstable testing approach comes with several advantages.

 

Reason 1: Money, money, money

The original application is inherently expensive, especially when compared with their web-based equivalent. time developers, after all, are not cheap. Compounding that is the fact that you have to support multiple codebases for iOS and Android.

 

With burstable test strategy, test the original application experts are available when you need them to test, and you only pay when you use them. For example, instead of having a large QA team, you can explode 20 testers for the day you need them.

 

And to ensure a continuous level of quality control is driven by experts with an intimate understanding of both applications, the problem of trying to solve, or the underlying platform, you are in the best position to close that the initial cost of investment.

 

Reason 2: They are built for one platform

As mentioned, the original application designed for a specific platform. IOS app will not run on Android, and vice versa. Language, libraries, and SDKs are essentially different. They use a different API calls. Sometimes, you have to create visual assets that are different for each platform.

 

This, again, reinforces one of the main advantages of testing burstable. It puts a human experience and understanding in the heart of the process. Testers experts in their field and pre-checked to make sure they know what they are doing. As a result, you are in the best position to account for platform-specific issues and edge-cases that would otherwise be missed by testing a more generic approach.

 

burstable testing also stressed the importance of a larger team, which is a necessity when dealing with multiple codebases, as it ensures your resources are not spread too thinly.

 

In addition, by testing burstable, each tester bring their group of real devices to test, so you get a great diversity in the device for testing. This is particularly important in situations like COVID 19 outbreaks in which the test device may be stored in the office of the developer, but the team worked from home.

Reason 3: The overall user experience is very good

native applications built using existing visual building blocks provided by the platform. Both Android and iOS have their own design language that dripped into their applications.

 

Of course, more than that. The nature of a purpose-built application is like that created with a specific purpose in mind. This means that designers know exactly the kind of experience that will make the grade due to usability testing, brand and familiarity with the general standard of UX on that platform.

 

That said, it's not all about aesthetics. Although it contains elements of graphic and motion design, UX design is mainly about the nature of the interaction - or, more bluntly, how things behave. This is very important when you are designing an application (which is a behavior-based object) as opposed to designing a document (which is an object-based content).

 

Every decision you make for your product must originate from users. You should consider the needs of the user first, before everything else. In other words, the practice of "outside-in design." Think about the needs of their users and context, design what the user sees and interacts with, and then go about deciding how to cope with all the challenges that lie ahead.

 

placing a burstable testing platform in the heart of the process and acknowledge that there will be the inevitable differences between environments. Tests meticulously documented before and can explain the problems experienced on a particular device. The distributed nature of burstable team means you can run test workflows on a wider variety of phones and tablets than you do with in-house test suite. So you get a larger number of tests from different locations, different personalities, abilities, and culture. The diversity in this test can help ensure that your application will work for your user base wider.

 

Reason 4: Functions and opportunities

One of the main factors driving businesses to embrace the original application on their web-based alternative is the fact they offer better access to function-level devices (such as cameras and microphones) and other aspects of the operating system through a collection of APIs. A higher level of HTML-based applications do not have that convenience or access area.

 

In many cases, the original application is also less dependent on an external online service. Users can walk into a mobile blackspot but continued working. And, as mentioned earlier, you can sync the app with the underlying operating system is UX convention.

 Also read: Top application testing company 

burstable testing turned out to test in a small process, which can be broken up and shared with a wider group of testers, which allows you to improve your overall test coverage while ensuring consistency across a the broad swath of the device.

No comments:

Post a Comment