The principle of network testing, collective
testing is a mixed team approach that aligns the process and tool to be a
smooth workflow. This allows various forms of collaboration by regulating
various test teams to cover more testing surfaces in a shorter time, under the
integrated test management platform. For example, in-house testers may test
safe code designed for internal eyes. Meanwhile, network testing resources can
provide exploration testing and real device coverage.
3 main benefits of collective testing
Many clients ask if there are ways to test their in-house to
use the same QA platform as we provide with our 10,000 freelance tester.
Organizations that prioritize quality want can ...
Open the test surface with the option for in-house, network
testers, and both resources combined
Buy testing services managed fully or jointly managed based
on their budget
Simplify operations and reduce costs by getting rid of
unnecessary test management tools and move all resources (internal and
external) to one platform
Our collective testing approach allows all the above. You
can use our test management software with your in-house testers, our released
testing network, or both. You can also choose the level of the right QA
management service, based on your internal needs.
Let's explore 3 benefits of collective tests.
1. Increased utilization of in-house testers
With collective testing, you can activate resources based on
your needs, instead of being locked to set costs.
Use In-house testers for basic needs - you are not trapped
in an expensive contract with QA vendor. You can have your in-house testers
handle some of your needs, and add network freelance resources to suppress the
release cycle and surge in the project load.
Manager involvement co-managing network testers - Another
way to utilize your in-house resources better through collective testing is to
have a manager involvement of Testio Co-Manage Testio resources for more
specific project management.
In-house and external testing tests together with each other
- you can also add some of your internal QA tester to the test cycle that is
being worked on by Sapizon network testers to expand capacity. It will also
ensure that network testers have internal contacts that can be known to switch
with any questions during the test cycle.
In-House Test Code Safe - If there is a code that you only
want internal employees to see, you can be easier to do internal testers, and
then have external resources carry out functional testing or usability in a
smooth and integrated workflow.
2. One platform for all resources and strategies
But why is this important? Being in the world of software,
we know that the phrase "everything in one" is also very meaningful
or very few, depending on the use case.
When it comes to QA, having a single testing
management platform happens to be many things. For one thing, the
collective testing platform allows you to better utilize your internal
resources with four detailed methods above.
Without cohesive platforms, your in-house testers cannot
collaborate smoothly with external resources. This does not allow your
organization to maximize the budget for testing your software.
One platform has other benefits besides helping you get the
most out of your internal resources. Because you can easily add network testing
resources, you can accelerate your test cycle as needed. Faster test cycles
mean releases faster. Having all your test management in one cohesive place
also makes bug find and repair it faster too.
The easiest time to repair defects is when fresh, so the
faster the collective test team you can find and report bugs, the faster your
release.
For additional bonuses, put your internal QA and external QA
on the same platform representing cost-effective, because you can cancel your
subscription to your Legacy Test
Management Tool, which is not optimized to utilize freelance resources
checked.
3. Higher QA and UX standards
In the end, collective testing leads to an increase in QA
and UX, because you will have the right amount of resources at the right time,
joint collaborative testing.
Here are some ways of collective testing leads to higher
quality:
Efficient operation - get rid of excessive tools and bring
everyone together to increase efficiency and ensure that fewer bugs and set
features fall through the gap. Plus, experience testing results on days,
overnight, or over the weekend.
More QA resources - with collective testing, you can add the
resources you need, both for new features or important updates. You are not
stuck with only your internal team and low level testing levels.
Quality freelancers - Managers and QA engineers often
complain about crowdsourced testing. Unfortunately, most crowdsourcing testers
are paid per bug, which leads to reports of low-quality problems. At the same
time, the lack of management leads to no priority bugs. With a collective
testing approach, you access clarified and quality freelancers paid every hour,
working collaboratively, and managed by your involvement manager or QA in-house
manager. Sapizon SAP clients share the importance of experienced testers that
help them increase the level of fixed problems 3x.
Localization and coverage of better devices - when you take
advantage of collective testing, you use a quality freelancer network. This
means you can access the testers that are connected based on the language they
say, the country and city where they live, the devices they have, and more.
With collective testing, your team has more control over
regular testing and special cycles.
Do you want to make your own test case and assign it to your
freelance testers? Or do you want your involvement manager to make a test case
and set half of them to your freelance testers and half to your in-house team?
The third scenario is that if you do not have a QA in-house team, you can get
all the resources you need to run on the test cycle.
No comments:
Post a Comment