They say the quality is everyone's responsibility.
But what if everyone fulfills this responsibility in their own way, without following the previously determined guidelines, industry best practices, or protocols?
Also Read: Software
Testing Company in Cambridge
Because the individual approach, the results of the quality assurance process will not be harmonized with the objectives and objectives of the overall organization.
Because each team or unit will use the tool, platform, and their reporting mechanism, there will be a lack of standard ways in which QA results can be measured and evaluated. And, a non-standard approach to QA throughout the organization becomes an expensive affair.
If we look at the general software development methodology, from waterfalls become agile to devops, there is still a little important given to the QA function. Especially with agile waterfalls and SDLC, QA will come at the end of the development process.
Also Read: Software Testing Company in London
Have a QA in the end, it is also in a way that is not standardized, produces two things -
One, the code must be moved back and forth between the QA and Dev team to detect bugs and improve at the last time. Not only will it cause production deadlines to be encouraged but will increase the cost of QA.
Two, because there will be no standard way where QA metrics will be evaluated, the real ROI of the process cannot be justified. This results in an increase in concerns about dedicating time to the right QA process, and more tendencies to skip it at all.
The main objective and reason why every organization must standardize the QA process is to ensure uniformity throughout the SDLC, eliminates the possibility of confusion, prevents chaos, and produces the desired results.
Also Read: Software Testing Agency
Standardization of QA vs. Flexibility
The debate between carrying flexibility into the QA function and the standard is very important, and needs to be handled before we move further.
Flexibility and standardization are very important for any function to be effective, both dev, ops, or QA.
The right approach is to achieve the optimal balance between flexibility and standardization in the QA process. However, this might be quite difficult to do.
One practice that can be followed by the organization is to standardize the testing process such as reporting and tool selection while allowing flexibility in the actual testing process.
Flexibility is needed for QA practitioners to take a creative approach and reveal vulnerabilities & find bugs that are standard approaches or may not be enough.
Also Read: Software Testing Services
Therefore, it's all about finding the right balance.
Best practice for software quality assurance
Having the best practices arranged in an organization for the quality assurance of software guiding testers and all stakeholders involved with the ideal path for maximum QA efficiency.
Some of the best practices that must be followed for quality assurance and testing are:
Also Read: Software Testing Company in Manchester
Have a clear understanding of business goals
Determine the acceptance criteria that are not ambiguous for testing
Make a CI / CD life cycle and have QA running in parallel
Follow the right documentation for supported platforms, test plans, casts and checklists, and release records
Always do exploration testing to improve overall results
Build a Testing Center for Excellence (TCEE) to achieve QA maturity
Tcoe for QA maturity
Every business or organization requires Tcoe for:
Also Read: Software
Testing company in UK
Align their QA activities for not only project goals, but the order of the organization as a whole
Have access to resources with the desired technical and domain skills while maintaining training costs under control
Bring transparency across the QA function
Reduce testing time without sacrificing quality
Remove problems such as leaked defects and missed deadlines
Be at the top of all new testing trends
Standardization of your QA function throughout the organization
No comments:
Post a Comment